A state-level cooperative review in Jaipur on July 10, 2026 used a KPI-based assessment to rank the performance of district central cooperative banks and M-PACS, with Sikar District Central Cooperative Bank taking first place among the banks and Nimod Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti topping the M-PACS category. The meeting also signalled that monthly rankings will continue, turning the exercise into an ongoing performance-pressure system rather than a one-off review.
That makes the Jaipur meeting more important than a routine administrative briefing. The rankings are being tied to how well cooperative institutions turn government schemes into visible services for farmers, livestock rearers, women and young people, while also pushing banks and primary societies into regular comparison on delivery standards.
Quick Highlights
- Sikar District Central Cooperative Bank ranked first in the state with 67.42 points.
- Bundi ranked second and Jodhpur ranked third among district central cooperative banks.
- Nimod Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti ranked first among M-PACS with 77.50 points.
- Bhiya Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti of Bundi took second place with 76.50 points, while Ghat ka Barana Gram Seva Sahakari Samiti came third with 74 points.
- Officials said monthly M-PACS rankings will be issued using common KPI standards.
- The review also included a 16-question online quiz linked to cooperative schemes and banking, with more than 5,000 participants.
What the rankings were based on
The review, led by cooperation secretary and registrar Dr Samit Sharma through video conferencing from the Secretariat's Manthan Hall, was not limited to raw lending or balance-sheet figures. The department linked performance to a wider set of cooperative activities, including warehouse proposals and use under the grain-storage push, PACS computerization, business diversification, new member creation, loan distribution, Bank Mitra development and micro-ATM doorstep banking.
For M-PACS, the release said assessment factors also included resource availability, member outreach, financial position, audit compliance, non-farm activities and the actual functioning of computerized systems. That gives the ranking system a broader service-delivery shape instead of reducing it to a narrow scorecard on one or two banking tasks.
| Category | Top performers in the July 10 review |
|---|---|
| District central cooperative banks | Sikar first with 67.42, followed by Bundi and Jodhpur |
| M-PACS | Nimod first with 77.50, Bhiya (Bundi) second with 76.50, Ghat ka Barana third with 74 |
| Future review cycle | Monthly rankings to continue under common KPI standards |
| Broader focus | Computerization, member service, loan delivery, audit compliance and doorstep banking |
Why the monthly ranking system matters
The most consequential part of the meeting may be the decision to keep issuing rankings every month. That changes the review from a symbolic event into a recurring measurement tool. Institutions that score well gain public administrative credibility, while weaker performers face a more visible push to improve.
In practical terms, that could sharpen competition across cooperative institutions that often form the front line of formal financial access in rural Rajasthan. If monthly rankings are taken seriously, they may influence how quickly societies improve member outreach, digitization, audit discipline and day-to-day banking service.
What the review is trying to drive next
Dr Sharma also used the meeting to stress punctual attendance, non-discriminatory service and stronger implementation of cooperative schemes. The official message was that cooperative banks and M-PACS need to work together so the benefits of state and central schemes reach more people across rural Rajasthan.
The next thing to watch is whether the monthly rankings begin to shift institutional behaviour in a measurable way. If they do, Jaipur's review process could become a more durable control point for cooperative-sector performance across the state, rather than just a meeting that produces one day's list of winners.
